steam_lover@sh.itjust.works to Arch Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 months agoArch Linux Now Believes Malware Incident Under Control: More Than 1,500 Affected Packageswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up173cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.senews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showlinux@lemmy.ml
arrow-up173external-linkArch Linux Now Believes Malware Incident Under Control: More Than 1,500 Affected Packageswww.phoronix.comsteam_lover@sh.itjust.works to Arch Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 months agomessage-square24fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.senews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showlinux@lemmy.ml
minus-squareSenator Collins@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoI’m not saying it wasn’t safe, it’s just perhaps not quite as safe as some of the other ones.
minus-squaremed@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoWhat sort of standards are these packages built to?
minus-squareSenator Collins@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoWell, cardboard’s out.
minus-squareSenator Collins@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoWell, the packages are not supposed contain malware for a start.
I’m not saying it wasn’t safe, it’s just perhaps not quite as safe as some of the other ones.
What sort of standards are these packages built to?
For the AUR I think anything goes.
Well, cardboard’s out.
Well, the packages are not supposed contain malware for a start.