ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 day agoMeet Potential Languagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1200
arrow-up1200imageMeet Potential Languagelemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 day agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·23 hours agoIf nothing else, there’s also OpenD, which might be better for you based on your requirements.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·12 hours ago3 Ds? That’s too many! Let’s make a new D that encompasses them all! /j
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·12 hours agoThere’s now 4 competing standards. TBH, the compiler issue mostly resolved, only thing that is still problematic is module constructor order between DMD and LDC.
If nothing else, there’s also OpenD, which might be better for you based on your requirements.
3 Ds? That’s too many! Let’s make a new D that encompasses them all!
/j
There’s now 4 competing standards.
TBH, the compiler issue mostly resolved, only thing that is still problematic is module constructor order between DMD and LDC.