• Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Spooky meow from a distance. Yarn Theory. Scawy Vaccuums. Thermeowdynamics. Quantum Litterbox Theory. Science cat is still exploring the meowsteries of our world.

  • mkwt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The cat thing was designed to be as absurd as possible to heckle Bohr and Heisenburg.

    Similarly, Freeman Dyson’s Dyson sphere paper was a work of satire, to poke fun at how ridiculous the idea was. He got stuck with it anyway.

    • GiveOver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If Schrödinger knew that he was the modern day face of the Copenhagen interpretation, he’d be in a state of both rolling and not-rolling in his grave.

    • tyranny@crazypeople.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      same with the trolley problem. it’s supposed to be so obvious, like asking someone ‘if your friend jumped off a cliff, would you?’ that it shows that it is moral to choose the lesser of two evils. it wasn’t designed to be a debate

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        we’re talking about the intersection between ethics and game theory though. the simple problems (trolley problem, cat dilemma, pushing a friend off a cliff, prisoner’s dilemma) have simple boring answers. It’s once you change the simple problem that it becomes interesting, both in game theory and ethics