• Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    How did it arise by accident? It’s a system of imposing its will and subjecting others to its will and monopolizing the resources, it’s been around for ages and ages. It’s no different that colonialism/imperialism. People who push for capitalism are insane monsters without morals and a lot of them rape children

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I guess he means organically as opposed to led by ideologists like the Soviet Union.

        • ddplf@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Or you’re just so extremely in love with your ideas that you’ve become completely uninterested in basic facts that vaguely conflict with your vision of reality.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          And his stated goal was competitive markets forever, not absolute monarchy with more steps. People dunk on conservatives by quoting that book.

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          You’re so far off the deep end that it doesn’t make sense trying to rebut you, so I ask questions that have easy answers to try and discuss something more productive. As usual with folks who think they’re very smart though, you don’t want to answer because it’s not on your terms.

          Take a class in politics. Or hell just read a book.

          • Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            You’ve done nothing but argue some pedantic point of the origin that doesn’t really have anything to do with my original point, I don’t see this going anywhere so I’m not going to waste my time with it

                • FishFace@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  I don’t think monopolies are the “end goal of capitalism”, nor the rest of what he said.

                  What a weird question to ask in the context of the conversation. I noid you genuinely think I said something that implied that?

                  • njm1314@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 hour ago

                    I think you’re partially right. Because the end goal of capitalism is fascism. But then again fascism often does consist of monopolies. So glass half full.

                  • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    You talked about his original point, that was literally his first post. That was his Original Point. That monopolies are the end goal of capitalism.

                    Which they absolutely are, you’re just legitimately wrong. Capitalism inevitably ends in monopolies that’s why we have to break monopolies to artificially constrain capitalism. I mean honestly I’m flabbergasted that this has to be explained to you. Cuz just look around you. Name one industry in which that’s not happening. It’s inevitable.