VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 4 天前Then they share their lifestyle on tiktok for likesdiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up11.14K
arrow-up11.14KimageThen they share their lifestyle on tiktok for likesdiscuss.onlineVetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 4 天前message-square66fedilink
minus-squareprotist@retrofed.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 天前That’s a lot of generalizing. Sure, there are dysfunctional nonprofits and some overall bad people, but there are also some amazing nonprofits and people doing great work. I don’t like painting this with a broad brush like that
minus-squareSalamiDommie@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 天前Having worked for them - I am okay with guilty until proven otherwise. Because those who are legit prove so quickly.
minus-squareprotist@retrofed.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 天前When you say “them,” like who are you talking about? That’s what I’m talking about, using the term “them” to mean “all nonprofits” is fucking awful
minus-squareSalamiDommie@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 天前Most non-profits. And if you want to continue to support them as though most of them are good or a net positive then you are a fool.
That’s a lot of generalizing. Sure, there are dysfunctional nonprofits and some overall bad people, but there are also some amazing nonprofits and people doing great work. I don’t like painting this with a broad brush like that
Having worked for them - I am okay with guilty until proven otherwise. Because those who are legit prove so quickly.
When you say “them,” like who are you talking about? That’s what I’m talking about, using the term “them” to mean “all nonprofits” is fucking awful
Most non-profits. And if you want to continue to support them as though most of them are good or a net positive then you are a fool.