10
Elevated CO2 and warming intensify plant reliance on soil nitrogen reserves despite intensive fertilization | Nature Communications
www.nature.comUnderstanding how ecosystems sustain plant nitrogen (N) supply under climate change is critical, yet whether increasing plant N demand is met by external inputs or mobilization of soil N reserves remains unresolved. Here we show that climate change increases plant reliance on soil N reserves despite intensive fertilization. Using a two-year 15N-tracing experiment combining elevated CO2, warming, and drought in a montane grassland, we found that plants obtained 82–88% of their N from soil and acquired 4.6–7.3 times more N from soil than from fertilizer despite high N inputs. Elevated CO2 and warming increased plant uptake of soil-derived N but not fertilizer N. Consequently, plant N export exceeded fertilizer inputs, causing ecosystem N deficits and depletion of soil N stocks, with the strongest soil N mining under combined elevated CO2 and warming. Our findings reveal that climate change accelerates biological mining of soil N reserves, potentially constraining the long-term sustainability of intensively managed agroecosystems. A field experiment shows that climate change increases plant reliance on soil nitrogen reserves despite intensive fertilization, accelerating depletion of soil nitrogen stocks and potentially threatening the long-term sustainability of managed ecosystems.


Okay, the more I read the methods of their study the more “What the ever living fuck are these idiots doing?”
It’s a greenhouse study of a plugs in pots extracted from an established field. Okay, that works except … It’s an irregular mix of species including a legume. Sort of tossed the entire study into question. They discussed this issue a bit at the end and blew it off.
The source of fertilizer is mostly manure slurry. Okay odd choice given that manure slurry is known to vary dramatically in the balance of nutrient content and microbial composition. This massively effects its availability and uptake ratio into plants. Specifically important is a ratio of ammonium, nitrite and nitrate.
But there’s the a kicker they added in a heavy isotope of N (15N) in ammonia sulfate form as a marker into the manure. That’s how they attempted to tell the difference between existing soil N and N from the shit. Are you fucking kidding me…
What the study actually showed was plants under environmental stress uptake a heavier isotope of N at a slower rate. Their results have nothing to fucking do with where the plants extracted the nitrogen from (the soil or the manure). That’s not what they tested… Dumbasses.