• SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, for a start it’s a solution without a problem. We don’t really have an issue with voter fraud in the UK. All this has done is disenfranchise people who could previously vote without needing an often costly ID.

        • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I think voter ID is alright, but when you historically doesn’t have it and don’t really need it, it just seems to be a barrier for barrier’s sake.

      • WellThisIsNew@fjdk.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        It costs time and effort, something that disabled people often have less of.

        Voter fraud is extremely low in the UK, and most of what does occur isn’t stopped by these changes (the most common type is, for example, parents submitting a postal vote on behalf of their (18+) children without asking them), So here’s a question for you:

        If the number of people disuaded from voting due to the new ID laws significantly outnumber* the amount of fraud that’s prevented by this law, was the law a positive change?

        *To the point that it has a larger effect on election outcome

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We’ve had voter I.D. here in Northern Ireland for ages and I haven’t heard any complaints