• Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t heard of a better method than (properly regulated) capitalism. I’m open to one though.

    Communism and anarchism demonstrably don’t work, so don’t go there with me.

    Socialism I would consider a form of Capitalism (imo the best one).

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Saying socialism is a form of capitalism is…unconventional. I think very few people would agree. Personally I see socialism as something that can be blended with capitalism, but doing so results in a less capitalist system. And when I see someone advocate for capitalism, I assume they mean the mostly unregulated kind like you see in the US, and which is forced in a lot of poor countries under the guise of “economic development”.

      I consider myself a socialist so I guess we’re not as far apart as it seemed at first.

      But anyway, the point I was originally trying to make is more general: the best system might not even exist yet. In medieval Europe they thought feudalism was as good as it got, and ideas like capitalism and socialism hasn’t been invented.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree with all of that.

        My view is, capitalism is an economic program, and socialism is a societal program, and like you said they can be blended. Pure capitalism would have essentially NO societal program (ie no regulations) and would look something like libertarianism.