• pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s a measure of your risk to lenders, not profitability.

    Risky to lend to = lower score. That’s it.

    It’s weird how they calculate risk, but that’s all it is.

    • OldGrayDog@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      You are wrong in your assumptions. My wife and I both have 800+ credit scores at all 3 credit reporting agencies, we have a paid for home and no car loans, we pay off our credit cards every month, yet when we decided to buy a condo and sell our current house one of the negatives was that we haven’t had a mortgage or loan history. We don’t pay anyone interest and that is being held against us. The fact that the mortgage we’re trying to get will probably be paid off as soon as we sell our house is also a negative. If you’re not going to make them money they aren’t happy, and don’t get me started on the extra fees they try to slip in, I feel like I’m at the car dealership.

      • GreatWhiteBuffalo41@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Well yes that makes sense based on the comment you’re responding to. They don’t have data on how well you pay a loan because you don’t have that in your history. That makes you more of a risk because they don’t have data to say you’re not a risk.