Anark does (in my view) a well-cited and very polite refutation of Socialism4All’s response to one of his off-the-cuff videos, and a vastly more polite response to BadEmpanada than he deserves.

  • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@anarchist.nexusOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    28 days ago

    It’s also not coincidental that lefty cult leaders are often (1) personally wealthy and (2) live on the compound with their harem, though I don’t know it care enough to figure out if this particular grifter is also abusive.

    No evidence to suggest he’s abusive at all. It’s kind of a wild leap from “white anarchist man in a polycule” to “possible abuser”, no?

    If you’ve organized in left spaces you’ve encountered the loud ignorant white boy sectarian, and certainly those who place aesthetic over substance.

    He’s been a community organizer for 15 years. He is absolutely putting substance before aesthetic. He spent a few hours out of his fifteen years of activism to reply calmly to two critics. I guess that makes the rest of his work invalid?