Anark does (in my view) a well-cited and very polite refutation of Socialism4All’s response to one of his off-the-cuff videos, and a vastly more polite response to BadEmpanada than he deserves.
Anark does (in my view) a well-cited and very polite refutation of Socialism4All’s response to one of his off-the-cuff videos, and a vastly more polite response to BadEmpanada than he deserves.
No evidence to suggest he’s abusive at all. It’s kind of a wild leap from “white anarchist man in a polycule” to “possible abuser”, no?
He’s been a community organizer for 15 years. He is absolutely putting substance before aesthetic. He spent a few hours out of his fifteen years of activism to reply calmly to two critics. I guess that makes the rest of his work invalid?