The Superior Court of Washington ruled in favor of Oregon State and Washington State Monday, granting a temporary emergency restraining order against the Pac-12 that will disable the conference from conducting formal board meetings until the court rules further. Judge Gary Libey, however, amended the order to allow the Pac-12 to conduct business regarding urgent matters for the 2023-24 academic year before 10 of its 12 members depart for other conferences next summer.

The hearing and subsequent ruling came less than one week after Oregon State and Washington State, which are the only continuing Pac-12 members beyond the 2023-24 academic year, filed a complaint against the conference and commissioner George Kliavkoff. The complaint seeks to prevent any votes on the Pac-12’s future from occurring until legal clarity is obtained on who controls what is left of the conference.

  • Tujio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Keep filing injunctions. Sandbag the conference until all the other teams leave, and only those two teams remain. No expansion, no mergers, just make a 2-team conference with an automatic playoff bid. One of those two teams goes to the playoffs every single year.

    That’s revenge for how bad CFB is fucking these two teams.

    • garrett@fanaticus.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      From what I saw fromThe Athletic on this, it looks like the bylaws of the division require that you’re removed from the board when you file intent to leave so OSU & WSU are totally in the right.

      The worst part was that some of the teams leaving were hoping to carve up the PAC so they could use the resources to pay off the move to a new division. Truly embarrassing and dirty move.

      • wjrii@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The worst part was that some of the teams leaving were hoping to carve up the PAC so they could use the resources to pay off the move to a new division. Truly embarrassing and dirty move.

        Haven’t seen who. Have you? Off the top of my head, ASU, Cal, Stanford seem the obvious candidates as the ones who thought “this is fine” and may not understand what they had to do. I feel like Utah is counting on being good, the B1G schools actually will be fine, Colorado wanted out, and Zona loves basketball.

        • garrett@fanaticus.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t see any names but it seemed like all were interested in pocketing the resources they could on the way out.

    • milkisklim@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      So long as they play each other the same number of times in one year as other schools’ in conference games. You know, to be fair.

    • smort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unless it’s changed, the automatic playoff bids are for “top 6 ranked conference champions”

      So Pac-12 will just miss out on the playoffs and we’ll have two G5 conference champs in

      • Omega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        But then again, if the “champ” between them is ranked at all, they’d probably get in.

        • WingedThing
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          All of a sudden, Notre Dame wants to be in the Pac 3