• SocialistVibes01@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    In principle I agree (I mean, see the “Socialist” up there) but Linux isn’t the thing that will enforce ownership of anything. See Android.

    It could be, but it’s now in the hands of the same evil corporations that made some guys start GNU and shit.

        • potustheplant@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Except that it’s not “linux” like an actual open source linux distro is. There is no parallel here.

          Also, a negative example shouldn’t make you go “oh I guess there’s no hope then, let’s embrace the death of ownership”.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Android IS an open source Linux distro.

            It’s all the software that’s added to Android that’s proprietary. Binary blobs for Qualcomm chips, Google Play services, etc.

              • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                48 minutes ago

                Linux distros are free to choose which standard libraries and toolsets they use. Android has chosen not to use the standard GNU coreutils or glibc, they instead use toybox and bionic.

                There are other distros that use for example musl and busybox over glibc and coreutils. Ubuntu is also looking to replace coreutils with a new rust version that isn’t copyleft. There are also multiple init systems out there so you can’t say that systemd must be used to consider something a Linux distro. Etc.

                I’m wondering, what exactly about Android doesn’t count as a Linux distro to you?

          • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            It’s the kernel. For starters, Linux is a kernel. I don’t understand your point, the people running the Linux ecosystem (the corpos injecting money in the infrastructure and participating in the governance through the Linux Foundation) don’t care about user ownership. NVIDIA is a bad collaborator but it’s still allowed to do the shit they do. As other nonfree contributors on drivers.

            But let’s suppose an open and universal implementation standard of ARM and modem drivers was enforced? We’d have hundreds of viable Linux phones already. The battle wouldn’t be pretty but the alternative would be the current shitty state of affairs.

    • provectus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It could be, but it’s now in the hands of the same evil corporations that made some guys start GNU and shit.

      GNU was started because of a broken printer. Jokes aside, RMS got upset that the company that manufactured the printer could not give the source code for him to modify it to make the printer better. That is when he founded the gnu project and the fsf.