• QueenHawlSera@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I never understood people being confused by anthros and ferals co-existing.

    In real life we have apes that drive cars and talk, and apes that climb trees and eat banana. No one has any trouble differentiating between the two. I’m an ape posting on Lemmy right now.

    • Sundray@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Honestly, I only ever care about this sort of thing if the setting makes a big deal out of it. If the author never addresses the cast eating a ham sandwich or whatever, then I’m not going to pull that thread. If they try to rationalize it on the other hand, we’ll them I expect them to do a good job of it.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 day ago

    To be fair, real life Koalas are easily one of the dumbest animals going, with the actual smoothest brain of any mammal.

    And the reason for that is their primary food source, Eucalyptus leaves, are so nutritionally poor that they can’t afford the extra neurons.

    Hell, they’re so built on instinct that they’ll only recognise Eucalyptus leaves if attached to branches.

    So if any mammal was going to be depicted as non-anthro, they’re a pretty good candidate for it.

    • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      In Koala’s defense, I’ve heard people say that the “won’t eat picked leaves” thing is an evolutionary advantage to stop them from eating rotting leaves off the ground. Of course, there are other ways to distinguish fresh and rotting food, but like you said, limited neurons.

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        I have to think that if it evolved this way, then probably there are not better ways, meaning perhaps there is a pathogen that occurs on downed leaves that is invisible and odourless. Or perhaps it just takes them out of the environment where they are at least minimally adapted to survive. Evolution is cruel but it’s not stupid, and if it seems stupid it probably just means I’m stupid.

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Koalas are the only animal I know of that regularly die from bursting into flames. Eucalyptus oil is highly flammable and they are covered in it all the time, so occasionally they just immolate if the sun hits them the wrong way

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        59 minutes ago

        Okay but as often as humans cover themselves in something highly flammable and then accidentally immolate? I bet we take the prize.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s because god knows how smart they’d be if their brain was developed and had to gimp them. After all, the koala is the creator (at least according to Lower Decks)

  • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think they’re going off Disney rules here. Anthro animals are just the equivalent of furry humans.

    Also, are we just forgetting Arthur owns Pal and DW’s encounter with a deer? The characters being animals is just a stylistic choice.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Bojack Horseman plays a little bit with this, a guy orders a burger and apologizes to the waitress who took his order who is a cow. And chickens are chemically altered in ovo to be as dumb as real chickens, which makes it OK(?) to eat them.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          It’s pretty crazy that meat-eating is so normative that we can more easily accept a world where all animals talk than a world where those animals are all vegetarian.

          • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            We can be convinced that literally anything is “normal.” We’re social animals and we live in a socially-constructed reality. It’s more important to our individual survival to agree with the group delusion than to be objectively correct. In the 80s and 90s it felt like people had started living in a reality constructed by TV commercials; if people didn’t do it in a TV commercial it was weird, and if people did it on TV then it was normal. I guess we probably get our cues elsewhere now but clearly we don’t get them from our evolutionary social sources and there is a lot of reality hacking going on.

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s the equivalent of chimpanzees and humans. Just because we are a species which uses advanced tools and language doesn’t mean that other related species all died out. We’re Just very distantly related cousins.