So, to be clear, I am not doubting that he did this, but these pictures are very suspicious. The interface is too clean and perfectly contrasted across the entire screen which is extremely rare for cameras to be able to do, especially at a distance and an off angle. Some of the text has a weird perspective. This honestly looks like it might be fake.
Have you ever taken a picture of a screen before? It’s usually pretty washed out or has issues with focus, etc. Somehow these pictures are both perfectly sharp and have no brightness or contrast issues. In particular to get the screen brightness correct it almost always means getting exposure wrong for everything else but everything around the laptop looks fine still
Yes, I have taken plenty of analog screenshots. If there is no bright light (especially in the background) and the lens clean, why should it be washed out?
So, to be clear, I am not doubting that he did this, but these pictures are very suspicious. The interface is too clean and perfectly contrasted across the entire screen which is extremely rare for cameras to be able to do, especially at a distance and an off angle. Some of the text has a weird perspective. This honestly looks like it might be fake.
His lawyer isn’t disputing that he was in the chatroom.
That’s why I clarified that I’m not doubting that he did that.
Fake how? What? How is the interface supposed to look?
Have you ever taken a picture of a screen before? It’s usually pretty washed out or has issues with focus, etc. Somehow these pictures are both perfectly sharp and have no brightness or contrast issues. In particular to get the screen brightness correct it almost always means getting exposure wrong for everything else but everything around the laptop looks fine still
Yes, I have taken plenty of analog screenshots. If there is no bright light (especially in the background) and the lens clean, why should it be washed out?