readbeanicecream@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 1 year agoJudge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search enginearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up124file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partyglobalnews@lemmy.zip
arrow-up124external-linkJudge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search enginearstechnica.comreadbeanicecream@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 1 year agomessage-square6fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partyglobalnews@lemmy.zip
minus-squareSokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoWe definitely need technology judges and legislatures with a history in the industry or robust training. They make and rule on the laws and they don’t even understand the subjects they’re legislating.
minus-squareMidnitte@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThey need the judge that heard the Google Oracle API case - actually seemed to understand the implications of copyrighting APIs
We definitely need technology judges and legislatures with a history in the industry or robust training. They make and rule on the laws and they don’t even understand the subjects they’re legislating.
deleted by creator
They need the judge that heard the Google Oracle API case - actually seemed to understand the implications of copyrighting APIs