Now I’m not endorsing violence against that person if they’re found out, I’m just saying I wouldn’t be too upset if someone else was.

  • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 days ago

    i’m lucky enough to be in a union now, but i’ve lived most of my life in extremely union hostile territory. when attending my current union meetings and they take a few basic steps to maintain some opsec during executive sessions, some people act like it’s silly and i’m just astonished how sheltered some people can be in A.D. 2026 america.

    • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      3 days ago

      Anything else would have also been infiltrated so not hugely relevant but yes people do. It’s like Facebook used to be, the default thing for many and hard to move people off.

    • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean for the purposes of things like this the idea is probably that the majority of the people in question have a discord and it isn’t connected to company identities directly.

      This sort of infiltration could have happened on signal, telegram, slack, IRC, or skype.

  • Antiwork [none/use name, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    i would be interested in what level of access they had. a lot of these types of chats are to get info out quickly share news and memes, and not where you discuss plans or reflect on how things went. its expected moles will be their even if you try to keep them out so you do opsec by limiting the information getting out.