As soon as the claude subscription will be too expensive, it will be abandonware because he doesn’t understand shit about his own software lmaooo.
He was maintaining them long before Claude. Which is probably why he said “fuck you, I’m going home” when he gets shit on for using an LLM today. He was taking full responsibility for the comment’s validity but because he pasted the output of a model, he’s public enemy number one.
I’d have written the commit to make @classabbyamp the new maintainer, but I’m petty.
I’m not against LLM generated code in FOSS but it’s nice to see a dev holding the line. There are a million distros to choose from, at least one needs to be 100% certified meat.
Sop code cannot be FOSS.
This is arguably true but not tested in court yet. Free open source software licenses are all based on copyright, which can only be applied to the creative works of a human. Anthropic and OpenAI would love to see that wording changed, but as of now it looks like no LLM output can be copyrighted at all. Which is really hilarious for any company that hopes to replace their creative staff with AI. It does mean that GPL and any other software license (FOSS or not) can’t be applied to slop code as it’s outputted directly. Again, not settled law, but the letter of the law.
Aren’t all llm generated code foss?
Oh sweet, I didn’t know Void had a policy on this. Always good to see.
