witchdoctor@lemmy.basedcount.com to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 3 年前Search engines comparedlemmy.basedcount.comimagemessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up1293
arrow-up1293imageSearch engines comparedlemmy.basedcount.comwitchdoctor@lemmy.basedcount.com to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 3 年前message-square108fedilink
minus-squareKilgore Trout@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 年前They need to earn money somehow, and the deal with Microsoft is the least privacy-invasive option they found. I suggest overall to use SearxNG, but Qwant isn’t bad.
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 年前No doubt. And I’m not faulting them for making the deal or for collecting the data in general. I am, however, faulting them for claiming they don’t know anything about you and then turn around and collect things about you.
They need to earn money somehow, and the deal with Microsoft is the least privacy-invasive option they found.
I suggest overall to use SearxNG, but Qwant isn’t bad.
No doubt. And I’m not faulting them for making the deal or for collecting the data in general. I am, however, faulting them for claiming they don’t know anything about you and then turn around and collect things about you.