xxxSexMan69xxx@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoBroken clock rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1283
arrow-up1283imageBroken clock rulelemmy.blahaj.zonexxxSexMan69xxx@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square61fedilink
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoObviously, they think horseshoe theory has a point.
minus-squareirmoz@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoSo why humour a theory with no basis? All you need to do is Google anarchism and fascism, and compare.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoBecause explaining exactly why it’s nonsense, even if you can point to certain “socialist dictators,” can be a good opening into deprogramming a liberal that can’t define liberal. For those interested in such.
minus-squareirmoz@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago explaining exactly why it’s nonsense I already did.
So, in other words, they’re wrong
Obviously, they think horseshoe theory has a point.
So why humour a theory with no basis?
All you need to do is Google anarchism and fascism, and compare.
Because explaining exactly why it’s nonsense, even if you can point to certain “socialist dictators,” can be a good opening into deprogramming a liberal that can’t define liberal.
For those interested in such.
I already did.