• Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Exactly. We complainers aren’t saying they can’t post about politics, just requesting they post their political memes in the designated political meme space.

    EDIT: A message to people from Hexbear

    Thank you for your input, but I stopped responding to arguments here at least 24 hours ago because I can’t juggle that many conversations at once. I would ask that you respect that and not continue to argue with me about what is and isn’t political, because I’m just going to ignore it anyways. Thank you.

    • culpritus [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The concept of having ‘free speech zones’ where political speech is allowed is … very inherently political though.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone

      Civil liberties advocates argue that free speech zones are used as a form of censorship and public relations management to conceal the existence of popular opposition from the mass public and elected officials.[24] There is much controversy surrounding the creation of these areas – the mere existence of such zones is offensive to some people, who maintain that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution makes the entire country an unrestricted free speech zone.[24] The Department of Homeland Security “has even gone so far as to tell local police departments to regard critics of the War on Terrorism as potential terrorists themselves.”

      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        In this context, it’s matters related to government, politicians, or the general culture of a country, in which there are two or more major camps of conflicting opinions, where a good deal of people in one or more of those camps view the other camp as evil because of their view.

        If the post is in a community where only one of the camps is significantly present, but the post is attacking the other camp, it is still political.

        Why do you ask? Are you hoping to expose some inconsistency in my definition? Maybe use it to call something I like political with the expectation that I’ll disagree with you? Or were you expecting my definition to be biased, calling something political that shouldn’t be, so that you could expose me as a moustache-twirling villain?

        • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So we can’t post memes about … checks notes the general culture of our country?

          So no memes about anything with literally any specifics.

          You realize if you got your wish memses would just be “how many of yall like breathing”

          Maybe you could point us to an example of an acceptable meme with no politics involved.

          • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Earlier in this thread, I said:

            We complainers aren’t saying they can’t post about politics, just requesting they post their political memes in the designated political meme space.

            I also clarified that it has to be contentious, in a way where people condemn each other for thinking differently.

            Here are some non-political memes posted in this community in the past hour:
            https://lemmy.ml/post/5184036
            https://lemmy.ml/post/5185652
            https://lemmy.ml/post/5185650
            https://lemmy.ml/post/5186256
            https://lemmy.ml/post/5186204

            That’s 5 of the 6 memes posted in that timespan.

              • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                32
                ·
                1 year ago

                Here let me give you the codex.

                When this person says “political” they mean “things I dont agree with”

              • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t think “I don’t like my job” is politically divisive. You don’t really get people up in arms about it unless you’re complaining about capitalism or work in general. Even boomers have their “I’d rather be fishing” meme about it.

                • ProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  30
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t think “I don’t like my job” is politically divisive.

                  This is absolutely a political statement. Your work and conditions are political and can be changed only through seizing control and unionization, both political actions.

                • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  30
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  With the division of labour, in which all these contradictions are implicit, and which in its turn is based on the natural division of labour in the family and the separation of society into individual families opposed to one another, is given simultaneously the distribution, and indeed the unequal distribution, both quantitative and qualitative, of labour and its products, hence property: the nucleus, the first form, of which lies in the family, where wife and children are the slaves of the husband. This latent slavery in the family, though still very crude, is the first property, but even at this early stage it corresponds perfectly to the definition of modern economists who call it the power of disposing of the labour-power of others. Division of labour and private property are, moreover, identical expressions: in the one the same thing is affirmed with reference to activity as is affirmed in the other with reference to the product of the activity.

                  Further, the division of labour implies the contradiction between the interest of the separate individual or the individual family and the communal interest of all individuals who have intercourse with one another. And indeed, this communal interest does not exist merely in the imagination, as the “general interest,” but first of all in reality, as the mutual interdependence of the individuals among whom the labour is divided. And finally, the division of labour offers us the first example of how, as long as man remains in natural society, that is, as long as a cleavage exists between the particular and the common interest, as long, therefore, as activity is not voluntarily, but naturally, divided, man’s own deed becomes an alien power opposed to him, which enslaves him instead of being controlled by him. For as soon as the distribution of labour comes into being, each man has a particular, exclusive sphere of activity, which is forced upon him and from which he cannot escape. He is a hunter, a fisherman, a herdsman, or a critical critic, and must remain so if he does not want to lose his means of livelihood; while in communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic. This fixation of social activity, this consolidation of what we ourselves produce into an objective power above us, growing out of our control, thwarting our expectations, bringing to naught our calculations, is one of the chief factors in historical development up till now.

                  • Marx. The German Ideology.

                  Tl:DR work under capitalism fucking sucks because it’s exploiting us and not fighting for your liberation is politically divisive

                  • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Well by that logic, merely saying “I have a job” is a political statement.

                    Also I’m not reading all that, thank you.

                • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “I don’t like my job” is so political people bled and died to the american government for your right to not have to do it 80 hours a week as a 12 year old.

            • ProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              35
              ·
              1 year ago

              First one is about technology and alienation under a capitalist mode of production, discussing work and leisure. That’s political.

              Third one is about dating and advertisements online, which is related to sexual politics and commodification of sex work online. Political.

        • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re pretty upset that I asked a question aren’t you? I wonder why that is.

          Government and politicians I think are pretty self explanatory and I would agree those are inherently political, no argument there.

          What do you think is part of a general culture of a country, or not? How would you define culture that has conflicting opinions? Is it solely up to your discretion, or would you agree that if anyone has any disagreement about a meme that would make it automatically political?

          Is this one political because it references the FBI, a governmental organization? https://startrek.website/post/1847371 I would argue that it is political.

          Is this one political because it references culture related to advertising in capitalism? I would think everyone should agree that any reference to or commentary of an economic system is inherently political because of course economic systems are controversial. I don’t see how anyone could argue that references to a combination of two major brands isn’t a commentary on marketing: https://programming.dev/post/3200916

          I mean this one references politics so it’s clearly political right? https://lemm.ee/post/8502748

          I’m just curious about what you and others think is political versus not. You can’t have a discussion about if something should or should not be allowed if you can’t clearly define the boundaries of that thing. I find the discussion around what is and isn’t politics to be an interesting one, that’s all.

          • Waker@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I think can answer the memes questions for you.

            1. Non political
            2. Non political
            3. I guess it could be considered political in a way, but it doesn’t target a specific party or opinion so I’d let it through.
            • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              34
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lmao. The FBI: famously non-political government organization that murders activists as easily as one can breath air.

              And Microsoft: famously non-political company that bribes lobbies the u.s government constantly to gain monopoly over their market, works hand-in-hand with federal agencies to monitor system users, and regularly influences city, state, and national politics in the pursuit of subsidies of the American worker in order to further boost their already gross profit margins.

              • Waker@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’m not disagreeing that some companies can have a political impact on the world.

                Those memes in particular, aren’t focused on the political aspects. You have to be missing a brain in order to miss the point there.

                  • Waker@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There’s no point arguing with you since you can’t understand the basic concept of what the point of a meme is nor can you read what I previously wrote.

                • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  22
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No you have to be missing a brain to think monopolies don’t have anything to do with politics.

                  Stealing a line from something I saw earlier. If you don’t like the memes just ignore them like you do the homeless people you walk by, non-politically.

                  • Waker@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I never said they don’t have anything to do with politics you dumbfuck. Re-read my post.

                • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  20
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  When you get to the size of a monopoly like that, you operate on such a massive scale that your very existence as a company, and the actions required to grow and sustain it, is orders of magnitude more politcal than say, the small-scale relationship between a restaurant owner and their employees, which is also inherently politcal.

                  • Waker@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Again, I’m not saying you guys are wrong. What I’m saying is that the point of the meme is NOT political in nature.

              • Waker@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You’re entitled to your opinion. It doesn’t make it less wrong though, the content of the memes is clearly not political.

                  • Nelots@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Acknowledging the fact that politics exist is not inherently political. Please explain how that third meme is even remotely political?

                    Regardless, the lack of a clear and simple political-or-not binary is not an excuse to avoid moderation. The political nature of some things will be argued and some things will slip through the cracks. It happens with all spectrums. But on the other hand, some things are so clearly political that it’s nigh impossible to argue they’re not. I’m sure you can see the massive difference in a meme about Microsoft shoes and a meme about Trump or Biden bad. Those clear extremely political memes are the ones people want banned to their own communities.

                    And to be clear, I actually like political memes. I just find your rebuttal to be in bad taste.

                  • Waker@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    They are wrong because those memes aren’t politic. They are not mentioning any party or political affiliation in any way.

                    Do companies influence politics? Absolutely. But that’s not the point of the meme.

          • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not upset, just suspicious because I’ve seen you asking that question a lot.

            Obviously what I consider political is up to my discretion, but I’m pretty sure the general definition does not include contentious memes, and mine doesn’t either because I gave a clause about one side considering the other side evil because of it.

            In general, if a person asks themselves “is what I’m posting political?” they can answer correctly 95% of the time, and the 5% of edge cases won’t upset 95% of the complainers.

            • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              34
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s an awful lot of words to implicitly say “it’s not political if I agree with it”

              “If a person asks themselves is this political they can answer correctly 95% of the time.”

              Yea turns out it’s easier to answer a question correctly if you’re deciding I’d the answer is right or not.

              • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s an awful lot of words to implicitly say “it’s not political if I agree with it”

                Where are you getting that?

                • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  21
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Where you said your test is asking yourself if you thought it was political and saying you were right 95% of the time.

                  • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    What I meant was that anyone can ask themselves if it’s political, and 95% of the time they’ll get it right by the standards of 95% of the people who don’t like politics.

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly! Just like how nobody was saying Rosa Parks couldn’t ride the bus. She would have gotten to her destination anyway had she just ridden at the back like we requested!

        • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re right. Wanting people who make you uncomfortable to go to their own area so that you don’t have to see them or think about their political grievances has no parallels with segregation.

          • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Look, yes obviously as socialists we are not welcome in most public places if we speak out, but of all places to make that claim Lemmy.ml is not the one. The mods here are comrades. This is, next to hexbear and grad, probably one of the online spaces most receptive to us. The lemmitor you were replying to has no institutional power against us at all. I hate to tone police but posting on Lemmy is not comparable to being Rosa Parks and trying to make a tortured analogy isn’t helping anyone.

            • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              The atomic unit of propaganda is emphasis. If you force people to stop posting “political” memes in the main memes space then you are implicitly taking the stance is that “non-political” memes are normal and “political” memes are the other. Everyone intuitively understands that being othered is not desirable because the advocates for separation are not the ones volunteering to create their own apolitical memes space, they’re trying to get political memes ejected from the mainstream space.

              Of course this isn’t literal segregation, but the arguments for separation basically all boil down to “go to this separate but equal space and stay there” so if they don’t want to be compared to people who historically made the same argument, they should try coming up with a different argument.

    • Piers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re on the memes community for a political instance. If you were complaining about politics in the lemm.ee or lemmy.world meme communities I’d be entirely with you.