• kitonthenet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not saying it has to be absurd, but no one is acknowledging that the security risks are real, and requiring a lesser standard of security is a cost of legislating this stuff, which it is the editorial stance of ifixit to support

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      The security risks aren’t real. They are simply trying to scare off people like you who will repeat nonsense over and over again.

        • Zangoose
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, you can’t, because that isn’t a good analogy. Those two situations are not at all the same, but I’ll humor you.

          The analogy you’re making is like saying only the company who makes doors is allowed to change the lock on your door, and they’re allowed to just stop offering the lock-changing service whenever they want. They also conveniently put a mechanism in so that whenever a third-party locksmith comes, your door falls apart. Your only option is to buy a new door, doorknob, frame, and hinge because your lock is worn out.

        • papertowels
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s a bad comparison because I wouldn’t let a random Internet stranger fix my phone either, but I would allow an actual locksmith to change my locks.

        • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you swap the faceid, you still need to unlock the phone with your passcode to re-enroll faceid.

          I guess that’d be more like you changing the outside doorknob.