• AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, tools that aren’t drop-in replacement have often different workflows. thats simply a fact. It doesn’t imply that those tools have features that aren’t available in others.

    You can pretty much do nearly everything in krita that you can do in photoshop. Perhaps RAW support isnt there though.

    Pick a lane, dude.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Just because the tools aren’t one for one compatible doesnt mean they don’t have equivalent features.

        Sure, Photoshop has a few (dozen) features that Krita doesn’t, but no one uses those anyway.

        You can’t have both.

        • macniel@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          don’t cite something I’ve never said.

          What I said is: Krita can do many things that Photoshop (pixel manipulation, layer effects, pathing, animation etc.) can also do. But on other fronts, like RAW Manipulation (like non-destructive Editing) or croppin g, it may fall short. So what can you do to mitigate that? Adjust your workflow by introducing, if possible, other tools that can do those things.