• foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah this post is nearly upsettingly ignorant.

    Cloudflare is just about the only big internet company out there objectively doing good things for the Internet.

    • danwardvs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 year ago

      This seems like saying road construction makes driving objectively worse or security guards make a stadium venue objectively worse.

    • spacesweedkid27 @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe their point is just privatisation or something.

      For example a dns provider like cloudfare just could artificially make latency costs for servers that don’t agree with something cloudfare does bigger, which would result in them being less likely to be displayed in a search result because a search engine would have IP adresses faster from other servers. This obviously depends on if a search engine makes dns requests or just provides hostnames for the end user.

    • planish@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right now.

      But everybody is also moving into their castle. Many for free.

      They are not allowed to let people do that unless they have an argument that, somehow, this makes money for the owners of Cloudflare. Maybe that’s in the form of good publicity. Maybe they’re hoping to set up some tollbooths at the castle gate, once enough people are inside and the other options have withered for lack of customers.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        They have existed for over a decade wtf are you on about. They’re publicly traded and doing very well.

        This is more nonsense in a thread full of nonsense.

        • planish@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That suggests they’re less likely to try to frantically monitize in a way that risks killing their brand’s reputation. Maybe they’ll stay nice indefinitely.

          • BoscoBear@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Anyone providing services for a profit could pull a Unity at anytime. Still, I think you need more for the “slippery slope” argument.