• masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Server rendered sucks ass. Why would I want to pay for an always running server just to render a webpage when the client’s device is more than capable of doing so?

    Centralization is just pushed because it’s easier for companies to make money off servers.

    • philm@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t have to render everything on the server, a good hybrid is usually the way to go. Think SEO and initial response. I think lemmy-ui could will also benefit from it (google results)

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it will give you the best of both worlds, but at a fundamental level I still hate that I have to pay for an always running server just for SEO, if I can get away with it I’d much prefer a purely static site that has to have its content pages rebuilt when they change.

    • sznio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because it’s better to deliver a page in a single request, than to deliver it in multiple. If you render the page on the client you end up making a lot of requests, each one requiring a round trip and adding more and more delay.