• Stop ignoring history Jews were living on that territory for thousands of years, unlike Europeans un America. You are conveniently ignoring facts which would immediately render your analogy completely bogus.

    • Lurk99777@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And the native Americans weren’t? You’re the one ignoring history or intentionally misunderstanding the analogy.

      • CuteCatBeingEatenByHaitian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Case A: population X came to a new land and killed almost all of population Y which lived there before.

        Case B: population X came back to their homeland, got attacked by population Y, won the war, didn’t not kill population Y, regularly tried to establish truce with population Y which continues to refuse the population X’s right to exist.

        • Lurk99777@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Their homeland? It wasn’t their homeland for hundreds of years. The Zionist movement displaced people already living there who had nothing to do with a conflict that occurred hundreds of years prior. They didn’t kill the Palestinians outright but they sure as hell did a good job of systematically stripping them of their rights to exist.

          Their stated goal from the beginning was to invade and establish a religious state where people were already living similar to what Europeans did when they colonized the Americas.