• neryam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is often repeated and very damaging misinformation. An EV powered purely by coal is significantly better for the environment than an ICE car over its lifetime. This is because coal fired power plants are more efficient than internal combustion engines due to economies of scale, even after taking into account transmission losses.

      https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/when-do-electric-vehicles-become-cleaner-than-gasoline-cars-2021-06-29/#:~:text=Even in the worst case,grams%2C the Reuters analysis showed.

      • ClaireDeLuna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh today I learned, TBH my information was probably out of date. But this is good to know. Definitely a step in the right direction even if more diversified public transportation options are better

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s more so outdated parroting than deliberate misinformation. A lot of the times I see people trying to back this one up, it’s with Hawkins et al.'s Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles paper. A 2012 study that analyzes emissions based on manufacturing and energy production capabilities of the time doesn’t hold up well over a decade later.

        You would think that would be obvious, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lithium mining is incredibly horrible for the environment.

      Guess what else is incredibly horrible for the environment? Oil extraction. In fact, oil extraction is arguably worse for the environment.

      Let’s put this tired talking point to rest, forever. It’s more than likely been invented by the special interest groups for oil.