• CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, that’s your choice to side with her on that. A lot of people are interpreting it as 1) a terrible time to try to be funny and 2) can easily be interpreted as support for Hamas, until she got a ton of backlash and it started to cost her money and then she ‘totes didn’t mean it that way, just a prank, for realz!’

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That was her mistake - the comment was too vague, so the media jumped on it, skewed the narrative, took that skewed narrative and grossly exaggerated it further, and denounced her as pro-Hamas. It’s obvious to see with even a little bit of reading and it’s both frightening and disgusting.

        • atetulo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Uhh, no. It was not her mistake that biased media outlets with an agenda say she said something while not actually reporting the exact thing she said.

          It’s bad journalism, but I don’t think anyone expects reputable journalists to take this matter seriously.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, that one comment was not vague, the only active “fighters” to be called “freedom fighters” were Hamas.

          There is no ambiguity, no vagueness.

          • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is absolutely ambiguity, it just doesn’t suit your worldview (or similar) so you lie. It’s your right to lie, but just know that anyone who isn’t dogmatic knows you’re lying.