• PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I prefer to think of it as a transitory stage. I don’t know what comes next, but I sure as shit know that this ain’t the peak of human civilization.

      • teft@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        If we’re following the star trek timeline we’re fucked. The period from the late 2020s until we made contact with the vulcans in 2063 in the star trek timeline is pretty much just war and oppression.

          • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            hard times (ww2) create strong men (quasi-socialists, social democrats)

            strong men create good times (post-war boom, worker’s rights laws and unions)

            good times create weak men (baby boomers).

            weak men create hard times (60% of americans live paycheck-to-paycheck)

    • soloner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see it as a stepping stone to the inevitable (socialism). But I would not want socialism now.

      Capitalism seems to drive innovation too, which with climate change humanity needs pretty desperately.

      I’m giving it 100 years. I think at that point capitalism will have done its job. We’ll all be free of many ailments and the world will be connected. Some resolution for climate change will be in effect, and we can take a breather, start transitioning to UBI and then eventually to full socialism. That will bring better social order and welfare and we’ll be in good shape.

      • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Capitalism seems to drive innovation too, which with climate change humanity needs pretty desperately.

        oil companies were suppressing information and reseach on climate change because they were maximizing shareholder value.

        • soloner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, capitalism creates incentives - that’s my point. Thanks for proving my point.

          Just because some follow a bad incentive doesn’t mean it isn’t worth the other good incentives produced.

          Further, disinformation is its own class of problems we need to solve. You could have a socialist government and still lots of disinformation. So that’s not really unique to capitalism at all.

          • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And the bad incentives are the crux of the problem.

            Waxing philosophical about letting the extreme negative happen just because of what might come from that great pile of captured capital will lead to species extinction, not evolution.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the effect of capitalism on innovation is overstated, honestly. The SovUnion was quite productive scientifically, for all of its other faults and horrors.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        capitalism is literally the reason we might not even get another 100 years with society as we know it, so you might want to factor that into your considerations

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          At the least we need a revival of social democracy. Reaganite neoliberalism since the 80s has done incredible damage to the West.