Very difficult to discuss with the fiance without know the terminology yet lol

  • bnaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Personally that term makes me a bit uneasy. To me it sounds too grandiose and organized just for something that might just be some random people shitposting or chatting about their interests. And actually having tight knit communities can easily lead to all kinds of negative effects, group think, hierarchies and drama.

    Of course some subreddits, forums, lemmy communities etc can be actual communities but just as a personal preference I don’t like the idea of calling them that default.

    • BigUwU@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t like the term community because it’s difficult to understand the hierarchy. Is an instance a part of a community? Or vice versa?

      What do you think of subinstance?

      • bnaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        To me subinstance sounds more like a technical term, but I guess people would just call them subs anyway. I think that’s a problem in general with deriving anything from “instance”.

        I guess community does a good job at being a more human centric term. You have the technical side of things, servers and software (instances) and on those you have the actual user facing parts (communities) so in that way it’s kinda fitting.

        Further overthinking about the terminology I just realised that Lemmy calls joining communities “subscribing” and Reddit calls it “joining”, while I would naturally think it would be more fitting the other way around. Naming things is hard.