bot@lemmy.smeargle.fansMB to Hacker News@lemmy.smeargle.fans · 2 years agoUSB-C teardown with CT scans: Thunderbolt and morewww.lumafield.comexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up144file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mlapple@lemdro.idandroid@lemdro.idhackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up144external-linkUSB-C teardown with CT scans: Thunderbolt and morewww.lumafield.combot@lemmy.smeargle.fansMB to Hacker News@lemmy.smeargle.fans · 2 years agomessage-square15fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mlapple@lemdro.idandroid@lemdro.idhackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
minus-squareJumpinship@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-22 years agoYou can get same quality thunderbolt cables that are constructed 100% the same way for under 25 bucks
minus-squareKairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years ago100% the same way? Doubt it. Of similar (or better) quality and function? Absolutely.
minus-squareMr_Blott@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoClent clearly paid $129 for a cable and isn’t happy at me 😂
minus-squareClent@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoI have no need for that cable, but unlike you I’m not ignorant in realizing some do and why they do.
You can get same quality thunderbolt cables that are constructed 100% the same way for under 25 bucks
100% the same way? Doubt it. Of similar (or better) quality and function? Absolutely.
Clent clearly paid $129 for a cable and isn’t happy at me 😂
I have no need for that cable, but unlike you I’m not ignorant in realizing some do and why they do.
You didn’t read the article either.