Masimatutu@lemm.ee to Fuck Cars@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agotitlefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1506file-text
arrow-up1506imagetitlefiles.catbox.moeMasimatutu@lemm.ee to Fuck Cars@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agomessage-square22fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareScrollone@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up27·1 year agoI think he means it’s not accessible for users with impaired vision
minus-squareMasimatutu@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up29·1 year agoI guess that’s fair. I added a link to the post, hope that fixes it.
minus-squarelibrary_napper@monyet.cclinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 year agoLinks are better than a description. It also allows fact checking. Thank you!
minus-squarebaseless_discourse@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoI think both link and image is nice. and people who are too lazy to click can see the content in a reasonable form, people who want to fact check can follow th link.
minus-squarelibrary_napper@monyet.cclinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoYes. What shouldn’t be allowed is an image of a tweet/toot without a link to the source content
minus-squareEmma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoBetter to add the text to the description
I think he means it’s not accessible for users with impaired vision
I guess that’s fair. I added a link to the post, hope that fixes it.
Links are better than a description. It also allows fact checking. Thank you!
I think both link and image is nice. and people who are too lazy to click can see the content in a reasonable form, people who want to fact check can follow th link.
Yes. What shouldn’t be allowed is an image of a tweet/toot without a link to the source content
Better to add the text to the description