eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agocreator trollyaussie.zoneimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up11.27Kcross-posted to: exchristian
arrow-up11.27Kimagecreator trollyaussie.zoneeatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square70fedilinkcross-posted to: exchristian
minus-squareThat Dutch guy@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoBut what if following the rules got the pet or child hurt, and not following them would not hurt them. Because that is the case here. I completely understand the analogy, but the result bestowed upon the child/pet is what determines the subject : good/evil. Though I read a very good comment here that said both options could and should be replaced by “responsible”, which actually makes a lot is sense.
But what if following the rules got the pet or child hurt, and not following them would not hurt them. Because that is the case here.
I completely understand the analogy, but the result bestowed upon the child/pet is what determines the subject : good/evil.
Though I read a very good comment here that said both options could and should be replaced by “responsible”, which actually makes a lot is sense.