lichtmetzger@feddit.de to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 年前True next-gen graphicsfeddit.deimagemessage-square121fedilinkarrow-up1439file-text
arrow-up1439imageTrue next-gen graphicsfeddit.delichtmetzger@feddit.de to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 年前message-square121fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBldck@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 年前A six year old game for 1% of the nominal cost looks better
minus-squareSkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 年前I see. I was confused because they’re both ugly screenshots. It’s not like the top image is Batman Arkham Knight or something.
minus-squarelichtmetzger@feddit.deOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 年前 I was confused because they’re both ugly screenshots. Something must be wrong with your eyes then. Elex looks really solid for a small-budget game that’s six years old.
minus-squareBorgDronelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前I was confused at first as well, but they are both comparing waterfalls. The problem is that the waterfall in the bottom picture is so ugly (just a bunch of grey) that at first I didn’t even recognize it as such.
A six year old game for 1% of the nominal cost looks better
I see. I was confused because they’re both ugly screenshots. It’s not like the top image is Batman Arkham Knight or something.
Something must be wrong with your eyes then. Elex looks really solid for a small-budget game that’s six years old.
I was confused at first as well, but they are both comparing waterfalls. The problem is that the waterfall in the bottom picture is so ugly (just a bunch of grey) that at first I didn’t even recognize it as such.