• rocaverde@todon.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    @bioemerl @usernamesAreTricky @blazera wrong. The more cows releasing gas, the more saturated becomes the atmosphere. One thing is the carbon they eat and a very different story is capturing it back, or do you think the carbon problem from the oil industry is happening just because we drill the oil out?

    • bioemerl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m having a hard time even understanding your sentences at this point.

      All carbon from cows comes from plants, and all carbon in plants comes from the atmosphere.

      The problem with fossil fuels is because we are drilling and pumping the carbon out of the deep Earth and then emitting it into the atmosphere as a byproduct undoing hundreds of thousands of years of sequestration in just a few short decades.

          • rocaverde@todon.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            @bioemerl @usernamesAreTricky @blazera picture this. You have a glass of water and a spoon of salt. The water has a concentration of ions, when you pour the salt in it you move the balance to a higher concentration of salt. Basically you have an atmosphere with X concentration of CO² and lets say a population of a billion cows and a billion trees. What happens if you double the amount of cows and half the amount of trees? Do you think the CO² concentration remains unchanged?

            • bioemerl@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              lets say a population of a billion cows and a billion trees. What happens if you double the amount of cows and half the amount of trees?

              Relatively little. Trees aren’t actually a huge carbon sink.