• feoh@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also, how would that ‘weirdness’ impact using the device in a teaching context?

    • irdc@derp.foo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      People would learn bad habits.

      For example, due to parameter passing often being done via the zero page, recursion is unnecessarily hard on the 6502, whereas one could argue that recursion is one of the major skills to master for any programmer.

      • Richard@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        @irdc @feoh All programmers need to learn recursion and fully understand it so when they encounter it in the wild they can properly analyze what it is doing and replace it with non-recursive code.

        • irdc@derp.foo
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          A non-recursive recursive descent parser isn’t any easier to reason about.

      • feoh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        One could, but I would argue that this idea pre-supposed a very ascetic class of programmer, and that depending on one’s goals in learning how to program, recursion can be a useful concept but saying it should be the one litmus test for any learning platforms seems highly questionable to me.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They learn how to program in a more efficient way that makes better use of limited memory and CPU cycles. Which frankly is something modern programmers and game designers could very much benefit from considering how bloated and unoptimized much of modern software is, probably because they didn’t need to think about whether computers can actually run it.