Correct me if I got anything wrong, TA!

  • craftyindividual@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    No for real, most folks don’t know that. It’s very dangerous. Probably easier to boil in a pan on the stove.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not dangerous at all, superheating is rarely a thing and you can avoid it in a multitude of ways including slapping a spoon in your cup

      If you’re talking about the microwave somehow doing something to the water to make it irradiated or something (which I’ve also seen claimed): no

      • craftyindividual@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No I’m talking about superheating - OP is putting water in a smooth glass vessel with no points for bubbles to form. IT REALLY is worth mentioning to the casual viewer.

        • Nougat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s enough nucleation points, even in a pyrex measuring cup, to avoid superheating, as long as you’re just bringing it to a rolling boil at maximum (so like 3 minutes, tops), and then using it.

          The real problem comes when you microwave the water for three minutes, forget about it, then microwave it again. The nucleation points you had the first time around are now too few. Now when you pour the water into another vessel - or even just jog the water in the existing vessel - it can suddenly and explosively boil over.

          • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you look videos up, people have been able to many times over reliably produce superheating phenomina and “bump” (the term for the explosion) boiled water in a glass cup. Just look it up, it’s actually a pretty common science experiment people have shown.

            Mythbusters literally did an episode on it.

              • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You can literally go look it up. It’s widely avaliable info. Stop spreading dangerous disinformation.

                • Nougat@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Again - the issue is all about nucleation sites. These are “points where phase transition is favored.” Nucleation sites are necessary for the heated water to change from liquid to gas.

                  As you heat water, it will phase shift from liquid to gas beneath the surface at these nucleation sites. That’s where the bubbles and the rolling boil comes from in boiling water. So long as there are sufficient nucleation sites within the water holding on to tiny bits of air - whether those are tiny variations in the surface of the container, or particulate matter - there is no danger. If the water in the container is bubbling or rolling, there is no danger of “superheating.”

                  The danger comes when all the little air bubbles held by those nucleation sites have already been freed and left the liquid. The water is extremely hot, but it is unable to phase shift beneath its surface. Now there is danger, because there aren’t any nucleation sites left. Introducing new nucleation sites (making contact with previously uncontacted upper parts of the container, adding something like instant coffee, or pouring into another container) causes the phase shift from liquid to gas to happen again, and if the added number of nucleation sites is high enough, the whole container will try to phase shift at the same time. Because the water is in a container, with an open top, the only place for it all to go is out that top, explosively, like a bullet exiting a gun.

                  None of the previous paragraph will happen with potable water in a household container microwaved for three minutes.

                  https://mythbusters.fandom.com/wiki/Microwave_Madness

                  Myth # 3 - Exploding Water
                  The Myth - If a glass of water is microwaved, removed, and an additive placed in it, it can explode due to superheating.
                  Verdict - True
                  Notes - If the water had no impurities in it at the time of superheating (for instance, distilled water), then any sort of additive placed within will make the water flash to steam and violently spray.

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          From the comment you’re replying to:

          superheating is rarely a thing and you can avoid it in a multitude of ways including slapping a spoon in your cup

          It’s not worrying at all unless youve never used a microwave for this purpose. I’ve microwaved a shit ton of water in those exact Pyrex measuring cups and never had an issue with superheating. Nobody in my family ever has going all the way back to the 60s.

          • Lmaydev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s called selection bias btw.

            No one in my family has died in a car crash going back to their invention. Doesn’t mean anything.

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, it’s called experience with the device and situation at hand

              I’m not claiming superheating doesn’t exist, I’m pointing out that the top level claim of “this is super dangerous” is fucking bunk

              • Lmaydev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                The people who’ve been burnt by super heated water also have experience with the device and situation at hand.

                • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They’d not experience this situation as, like another commenter stated, even a pyrex glass has nucleation sites for boiling

                  If they’ve double-microwaved the water then they have a chance at superheating, but that is not the same situation as just microwaving water in a pyrex cup, the thing that was being called extremely dangerous

                  But sure, well just keep being scared of doing it at all because some people can’t remember that they already heated something

            • Floey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              The variables involved in driving are not reliable. Even if you’re the safest driver you can still be involved in an accident. The same cannot be said about repeatedly boiling water in the same vessel for years, like the person you are responding to. They are not lucky in the same way drivers are to avoid accidents.

      • Vincent@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not dangerous at all, superheating is rarely a thing and you can avoid it in a multitude of ways including slapping a spoon in your cup

        Ah, so I should just put my metal teaspoon in my cup and I’ll be fine?

        (Don’t put metal in the microwave.)

      • Vincent@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not dangerous at all, superheating is rarely a thing and you can avoid it in a multitude of ways including slapping a spoon in your cup

        Ah, so I should just put my metal teaspoon in my cup and I’ll be fine?

        (Don’t put metal in the microwave.)

          • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            As someone who has first hand witnessed a fair share of microwaves getting wrecked by people microwaving metal in them accidently, that answer is bullshit.

            If the metal object gets near the (typically right) side of the microwave, it 100% will arc and at best short out the microwave, but at worst I have first hand seen it cause a fire.

            The metal object effectively becomes quite a fair bit charged with electrons from the surrounding air from the microwaves running along its surface. This in turn slowly builds up a negative charge difference between the metal object and the surrounding walls.

            At enough of a differential plasma will form and an arc of electricity will go from the metal object to anything it can get close to.

            And if that “thing close to it” is the wall of the microwave that houses the actual unit in it, it can short out the electronics sitting in there.

            Also, it can seriously harm someone if the microwave isn’t grounded properly (and boy is that unfortunately more common than you may think), and they are touching the frame of the microwave, as now they are the ground.

      • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        including slapping a spoon in your cup That would mean microwaving a spoon which is even more dangerous…?

        Unless you mean repeatedly stopping the microwave to stir the water and starting again…

        At which point I have gotta ask: why not just use a kettle?