• too_high_for_this@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    The second amendment is nominally there to allow people to form state militias in case the United States get invaded.

    I want to add to this, because it’s never mentioned.

    As with most problems in the world (prove me wrong), it can be traced back to British colonialism. The British usually disarmed everyone in their colonies, but American colonists were allowed to have guns and form militias because they were actively forcing Natives off their land.

    Basically everyone had guns or access to them, and every colony had militias. Without them, there’s no chance the colonists could have then taken on the strongest empire in the world.

    So now the line is that we need guns to fight tyranny, or whatever.

    But… We did that. We won. We have a “democracy” now. We rounded up or killed all the Natives and fulfilled our Manifest Destiny™️. We have the most powerful military in the fucking visible universe.

    Does my dumbass alcoholic neighbor Randy really need an AR to fight the gubmint?

    • yata@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The 2nd Amendment is from 1791, decades after the US had become an independent country. So you can’t blame this one on the British.

      • TOGG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        As an Irish person, I say it’s ok to blame whatever you want on the Brits.

        • yata@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They declared independence quite some time before that. And your maths does not disprove my point in any way either way. The 2nd amendment does not have anything to do with the British. I know it must be a hard burden, but Americans must take full responsibility for the 2nd amendenment.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think they blamed the British. They just explained their theory as to why the colonists could take control.

        • yata@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          As with most problems in the world (prove me wrong), it can be traced back to British colonialism.

          I don’t think they blamed the British.

          You may not think so, but your reading skills leaves something to be desired.