MDN can now automatically lie to people seeking technical information · Issue #9208 · mdn/yari
github.com
Summary MDN's new "ai explain" button on code blocks generates human-like text that may be correct by happenstance, or may contain convincing falsehoods. this is a strange decision for a technical ...

Seems pretty bad?

  • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏English
    43·
    1 year ago

    That example someone posted where the AI refused to explain the oklch CSS functional notation, and instead said it doesn’t exist, pretty much exemplifies why this is a bad idea, although I can see how maybe there was good intentions by whoever implemented it.

    In my opinion, the “AI explain” is unnecessary, as I find the MDN contributors already do an excellent job of explaining things as-is, especially in the Examples section under the documentation itself

    • HairHeel@programming.devEnglish
      17·
      1 year ago

      maybe there was good intentions by whoever implemented it

      If an executive saying “find ways to use ChatGPT so we can be on the cutting edge” and a developer saying “eh, I guess maybe…” counts as good intentions.

    • qwop@programming.devEnglish
      11·
      1 year ago

      Agreed, and the questions I have that MDN doesn’t answer would probably be ones even less likely for the AI explain to get right.

  • TheOtherKundotron@lemmy.worldEnglish
    10·
    1 year ago

    This feature is in beta. That issue title is sort of exaggerated tbh. Test it if you want, but take everything their beta LLM spits out with grain of salt.

      • key@lemmy.keychat.orgEnglish
        8·
        1 year ago

        It’s crazy how this technology that does nothing more than automatically generate text similar to text humans would write (or whatever else it’s trained on) has so many people convinced it’s a source of expertise on everything.

        There’s nothing in there with a capacity of reasoning or awareness of fact. It’s the difference between an ALU and a CPU at this point. And a lot of people perfectly aware of that fact are essentially grifting the less savvy masses who see a black box that sounds smart.

    • Deely@programming.devEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      I suppose they can add source URL of information, so, you can verify correctness. But then I don’t get it why we need lying AI if we can get URL in the first place. So, it will work just like any other good search engine.

      Sorry if I sound salty, but I still don’t get why companies put fake AI engines everywhere.

    • nitefox@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      It may do more harm than good, it spits plausible answers that are either completely or subtly wrong (latter is worse obviously) and it’s not easy to discern how good an answer actually is

  • miega@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    I sometimes think that we might currently be at best AI state in the next 20 years or so until other significant technological improvements are achieved.

    these AIs were trained on human generated data, but now we’re gonna trash the Internet with AI generated truth sounding nonesense, so the same methods will likely produce worse and worse results