PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 年前incest cloneslib.lgbtimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1220
arrow-up1220imageincest cloneslib.lgbtPM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 年前message-square24fedilink
minus-square30p87@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-23 年前I typically associate “clone” with “an exact copy”, with the same exact molecular layout and even thoughts. So a literal exact copy. Clones on a DNA basis, so something possible for years, would indeed be different in some details.
minus-squarePM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbtOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 年前The definition of “clone” you believe in is science fiction nonsense. Why believe in nonsense when the scientific definition of clone is different?
I typically associate “clone” with “an exact copy”, with the same exact molecular layout and even thoughts. So a literal exact copy. Clones on a DNA basis, so something possible for years, would indeed be different in some details.
The definition of “clone” you believe in is science fiction nonsense. Why believe in nonsense when the scientific definition of clone is different?