period

  • darknyght00@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    For additional content, you can accomplish ad blocking in a number of ways. The ones that immediately spring to mind:

    • browser extension: most modern browsers have some extension framework available. I’ve been using ublock origin for a number of years with reasonable results
    • VPN: some VPNs include ad blocking as a side benefit to their primary function. Nord doesn’t seem to block ads on all mobile apps or is at least inconsistent in my experience
    • Network packet filter/PiHole: this has been on my to-do list for a while. Catches network traffic that looks like ads before it even reaches your device. Most involved and least portable
      • deranger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been using NextDNS for over a year now and it’s great. Been using that with hagezi pro block list with great results and minimal breakage.

        • wheresmypillow
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Any idea if it runs DNS over TLS? I’d prefer my DNS requests be encrypted.

          • deranger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure does. You can also do DNS-over-HTTPS. I have a 100% encrypted DNS request rate across all my devices and anything behind my router.

    • SchizoRamblings@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only option (other than mitm-ing yourself and stripping ads from the html maybe) for blocking first party ads or spoofed first party ads is ublock origin on firefox

      dns filtering can only block domains, ublock does full cosmetic filtering.

      • RemeJuan@readit.buzz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ive been using DNS filtering for years and many sites actually collapse the advert space when it’s not used, and while a plug-in certainly can improve the UI, the DNS blocking also disables the resulting tracking, the network requests still happen with the plugins.

        Additionally DNS filtering happens outside of a browser as well, so will block ads in literally every app as well, when setup correctly it’s also device independent.

        When I still ran my own PiHole, there where days where as much as 60% of the traffic was adverts and trackers.

        DNS filtering also extends to blocking things like malware and spam domains

    • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      A Pi-hole is easy to set up if you already have a Raspberry Pi and a router that supports changing the DNS (I had one that was rented from an ISP that didn’t).

        • Ado@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, sites that hosts their own ads like yt can’t be blocked by dns-level blocking for the most part. You end up blocking yt itself.

          On that front you need ublock in browser (for now) or a modded app like revanced on android, uyou on iOS, smarttubenext on firestick, etc.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Firefox Focus works on iOS as well, as does Safari with Focus’ Adblock rules imported!

      • CheshireSnake@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It is. And even if you wanted to localize it to specific devices, there’s also a standalone version. I’m using it on my laptop with Arch and it’s pretty good. Adblocking on the go, or if you don’t want (or can’t) mess with the router for some reason.

      • ChoadPuncher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was originally developed to run on a raspberry pi so most installers are Linux based. There is no installer for windows but you could run pinole on Docker Desktop in a VM.

        • MrEUser@lemmy.ninja
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re running it using Docker, that’s a container not a VM. And that IS the way you would want to run it, in a container. They’re easy to set up, easy to use, and easy to maintain.

          • ChoadPuncher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I meant you could run pihole as a container in docker on a windows VM if you really wanted to. Personally I run it on a docker instance and also on a dedicated LinuxVM on a seperate host for redundancy, but that’s probably overkill.

          • ABluManOnLemmy@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah but Docker Desktop uses a VM, either in WSL2 or Hyper-V. Docker Engine on Linux doesn’t use a VM and that’s what’s typically used for hosting services.

            • MrEUser@lemmy.ninja
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              The way, what was stated, was stated, indicated that docker runs virtual machines. It doesn’t. It runs containers, right?

              • ABluManOnLemmy@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Docker is a container platform. Docker Engine is the container host for Linux and Docker Desktop uses a virtual machine to run Docker Engine and containers in that VM.

                For example, if you use Docker Desktop on Windows, Docker Desktop will run Docker Engine in a WSL2-based VM and then run containers inside that.

                • MrEUser@lemmy.ninja
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  First, stop talking to me like I don’t know this already. Second, these facts don’t make me wrong or you right. The implication of what was said is that you run VM’s on docker. The fact is, you don’t. Stop arguing.

                  • ChoadPuncher@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    can you run pihole in VM? it would be practical for these weirdos that already use VM as a daily driver

                    Ok, so what I was trying to say was this…

                    Dude does most of their work out of a VM rather than the host, and asks if they can also run pihole in that VM. I was trying to say “yeah, but it’s a Linux app so either run docker from within the VM itself and run it as a container or spin up another separate VM”

                    But I agree. Not argument-worthy. There’s no grounds for ackchyually-ing here.

      • Trebach@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I believe so as long as your VM has an IP address reachable by the devices you want to use it for.

        I’m not sure if you’d want to employ it as your DHCP server though. You may get a chicken and the egg problem there.