• RedditRefugee69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The only thing I will say is that this can be a bridge behavior. If we at least get them to think with love and caring. If they believe I am going to hell, I at least want them to feel like they wouldn’t do the same if they were in charge

    In the internet and isolated from people who have different beliefs, it’s easy to forget that compromise is the only way forward without violence. In this case, not compromising freedom nor equality, but what you’re willing to tolerate in someone else’s beliefs

    • LinkOpensChest.wav
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok and we shouldn’t be willing to tolerate someone believing LGBT+ is dirty or sinful. That’s a belief that causes much harm. Imagine a trans child having to grow up in a home with parents who tell them it is a sin. LGBTphobia leads to abuse, all the time, so we should not tolerate it.

      Saying we should simply compromise is some blind privilege if I’ve ever seen it.

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do not know how to explain to you that there can be no compromise between someone who wants to do or be a thing and a person who wants to make doing/being that thing illegal

    • BabyVi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my experience the bigots tend to view it as a bridge the other way. It let’s them feel like they care whilst still pushing a destructive agenda. There is no compromise on the table, they just want you to submit.