One financial lesson they should teach in school is that most of the things we buy have to be paid for twice. There’s the first price, usually paid in dollars, just to gain possession of the desired thing, whatever it is: a book, a budgeting app, a unicycle, a bundle of kale. But then, in order to make use of the thing, you must also pay a second price. This is the effort and initiative required to gain its benefits, and it can be much higher than the first price.

  • thirdorbital@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    10·
    1 year ago

    I feel like there’s a lot more to this than “pay it twice”. If you’re talking purely in dollars, then you’ll want to consider maintenance and upkeep over the expected lifetime of the object and compare that to alternatives. Additionally, everything has an opportunity cost because no resource is limitless and you could have allocated it elsewhere. Finally, emotional and other intangible benefits are something that most people have a very difficult time quantifying.

    If you want to say “consider more than just the purchase price” then I’m with you.

    • Deebster@lemmyrs.orgEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      That’s a great point, although I think the opportunity cost can be considered as part of the first and second payments the article talks about.

      Maintenance is a third cost, I’d agree. The minimalist community likes to talk about the idea that your belongings own you.