fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agoWe don't judge here. :)mander.xyzimagemessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up11.04K
arrow-up11.04KimageWe don't judge here. :)mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square94fedilink
minus-squaremilicent_bystandr@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 years ago usually people consider mathematicians as scientists Yikes! … Wait, does this mean I can call a historian an artist? Then I’m game.
minus-squareBigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoYou can call them whatever you want, what are they going to do? They’re historians!
minus-squaremilicent_bystandr@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoIn twenty years time they’ll rip into me on r/askhistorians
minus-squareoce 🐆@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoHistorians are scientists imo. Is that a reference I don’t have?
minus-squaremilicent_bystandr@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoUsually (in my experience?) history is one of the ‘humanities’, which are more lumped with arts than sciences.
minus-squareoce 🐆@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoYes it usually is, but I think the methodologies for modern history research is very much scientific.
Yikes!
… Wait, does this mean I can call a historian an artist? Then I’m game.
You can call them whatever you want, what are they going to do? They’re historians!
In twenty years time they’ll rip into me on r/askhistorians
Historians are scientists imo. Is that a reference I don’t have?
Usually (in my experience?) history is one of the ‘humanities’, which are more lumped with arts than sciences.
Yes it usually is, but I think the methodologies for modern history research is very much scientific.