Edit: good to see I woke the shills

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    He is polling above Biden in every single national poll somehow. Unless something drastic happens in the next 365, Trump will be the 47th POTUS. Americans have a really short memory.

    • Zyrt@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is not true. Boomer landline polls also had va going red and look how that worked out.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Polls a year out from the election. They have zero predictive value with regard to the ultimate outcome. Any pollster will tell you this. In fact, they have been telling us precisely this, but maybe not all of us are paying attention.

      These results are still deeply disturbing.

    • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Guess if Dems didn’t want that they’d give another candidate a genuine shot, but ol’ Genocide Joe needs his legacy. This’ll be it.

      • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        Incumbents historically have a huge advantage, any new candidate would get absolutely swept by Trump. Most Americans are embarrassingly out of touch with politics

        • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          any new candidate would get absolutely swept by Trump

          The current candidate will get swept by Trump. Or have the polls changed recently?

          • Grayox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            Polls also had Hillary stomping tRump. Polls shouldn’t be trusted. Voting is the only thing that matters polls dont win elections voting does.

            • pingveno@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yup, polls can’t account for something like an “October surprise”. In Hillary’s case in 2016, that was the James Comey letter that was leaked by Republicans Congress. It had the desired effect, with her poll numbers dropping virtually overnight. He rescinded the letter, but not fast enough to make a difference. This was all prompted by FBI agents in the NYC office who were leaking like a sieve to the press. So if you ever hear someone grouse about prosecutors supposedly interfering with elections because they are prosecuting Trump for his crimes, remind them that Trump got a whole presidential term out of FBI agents interfering for him.

        • pingveno@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Especially a candidate with left wing politics. There’s a reason Democrats run center-left candidates for president once it gets to the general. Those are the ones that win.

      • Cowbee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately, the time for a better candidate was last election cycle. Incumbency advantage is too critical to give up.

        That being said, voting harder won’t ever move America to the left, that has to be done at the grassroots level.

        • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Incumbency advantage is too critical to give up.

          At this point, what advantage? He’s been polling worse than Trump. He’s more of an anchor than an engine now.

          That being said, voting harder won’t ever move America to the left, that has to be done at the grassroots level.

          With Dems there’s always an excuse to do nothing and hope really hard for vague change later.

          • Cowbee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Incumbency advantage persists. Swapping to a new candidate would likely be worse, even if the candidate is better, purely based on electoralism.

            Yes, the dems do nothing. This is better than Republicans, who do a lot of bad shit. Voting dem won’t fix issues, it will just prevent many more from cropping up. What fixes issues is grassroots praxis.

            • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Incumbency advantage persists. Swapping to a new candidate would likely be worse, even if the candidate is better, purely based on electoralism.

              I’m sure many people will be comforted by that when he loses.

              Yes, the dems do nothing. This is better than Republicans, who do a lot of bad shit.

              Read up on the Ratchet Effect.

              What fixes issues is grassroots praxis.

              I too, like vague undefined concepts that obfuscate real potential solutions.

              • Cowbee@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s not about comfort, voting harder won’t meaningfully improve anything, just prevent it from getting worse.

                I’m aware of the ratchet effect.

                Do you want me to list out every meaningful thing you can do to improve your life and the lives of others? Advocate, unionize, organize, volunteer, start a community garden, work at a soup kitchen, educate yourself and others, help someone in need, etc. It isn’t that complicated, really, and your denial of actually doing shit to help and instead whine about how Biden is a Neoliberal ghoul (which I agree with) and therefore can’t beat a fascist (I disagree with this) is absurd.

                • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Republicans actively laugh at protesters. If people are protesting, they think, “I’ve gotta be doing something right to be triggering the libs like this.”

                  /Grew up in a Republican household with all Republican extended family

                  In fact, the largest protests in history (to that date) were in opposition to starting the Iraq war. Fat load of good that did.

                  Democrats protest. Republicans vote. Guess who’s running the show.

                  • Cowbee@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Protesting helps a little, that’s not what I’m referring to by a grassroots movement. You can’t really do much in the face of a bourgeois dictatorship via electoral means, the system itself is designed against radical change.

    • pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s nuts how short people’s memory is. It was just a few years ago that yahoos were invading our nation’s Capitol and Trump was orchestrating a coup. Now Republicans are trying to convince everyone that wasn’t really a coup, and have you considered BLM and scary trans people? Meanwhile the Trump camp has their 900 page plan to efficiently make the federal government into a right wing arm of the Republican Party.