cross-posted from: https://feddit.it/post/3381833

Exciting news for who? Only the site owner is excited that a free resource now requires a subscription

“Yay! Now I have to pay another subscription! I’m so excited! Let’s celebrate with them!” - nobody

    • voxel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      well the old api is deprecated.
      what you’re paying here for is continued support of otherwise redundant part of the website, if you’re not willing to upgrade to the new one. The new API is free just like the old one

    • Hildegarde
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Open is not a regulated term. Any company can call themselves open regardless of anything.

  • LinkOpensChest.wav
    link
    English
    371 year ago

    Any service that is subscription based is dead to me. I’ve reached my breaking point.

    • El Barto
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      Subscription based services are okay. You pay for water, electricity, maybe a gym membership…

      What’s not okay is that they paint it as “exciting news!”

      Assholes.

      • teft
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        Water should not be profit driven.

        • El Barto
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re right. I guess I meant to say water distribution services. Utilities.

        • El Barto
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Do you not make a monthly payment for water and power? If not, then where do you live so that I move there?

          • @JamesFire@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            There’s a difference between paying for usage and paying for access.

            Although with all the fees added, most of what you pay isn’t even usage anymore…

          • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            California, I have rainwater collection that amounts to 3200 gallons, and solar panels. Power company pays my water bill.

            I have a filter to use the water for drinking or cooking but currently just use it to water plants

            • El Barto
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Cool. But you’re not OP, though. I bet California has utility companies that charge monthly.

              • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                They do, but as you’ve agreed elsewhere it’s long since past time to nationalize utilities, telecommunications, education, madecine, and basic housing.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        You pay for water, electricity, maybe a gym membership…

        I don’t think you should have to pay for any of this

  • southsamurai
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    You know, it wouldn’t be as bad if they weren’t trying to make it look like a good thing that takes it from just bad to insulting

    • voxel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      well the old api is deprecated.
      what you’re paying here for is continued support of otherwise redundant part of the website, if you’re not willing to upgrade to the new one. The new API is free just like the old one

  • @hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    So I’m not super familiar with OpenSubtitles as an org.

    Is the REST API a mostly viable alternative to the legacy API, or is it really shitty by comparison?