• GustavoM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    189
    ·
    1 year ago

    “But can Linux install things via a single .exe file? HAHAH EAT IT NERD!”

    - 10’ish years ago past me, before discovering the magical wonders of the package manager

    • RQG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      1 year ago

      I found since people are used to app stores, I’ve had a much easier time convincing people to try out Linux. My mom even said that she always wished her windows PC had a proper app store.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think it’s still important to explain the key difference between an “app store” and a package repository: the latter isn’t a “store” because everything is free.

        • FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not that good. It’s ok (especially now that it’s been unshackled from the hell of UWP), but it’s not as good as most Linux options.

          • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            For someone like OPs mom it would be more than good enough is my point. She’s saying she wished something existed that does indeed exist.

          • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Of course, and much of it is on the app store now (which I rarely use myself), but for someone like OPs mom who just wants an easy app store, well there is one.

      • Kierunkowy74@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        What chmod step?

        When I clicked on new app image, the OS told me, that program /name of app/ will be launched, I clicked “Continue” and it runs! No meddling with “chmod” or anything like that.

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          ELF and .sh files need to be set executable, chmod +x file, before they can be run, unless your DE does that for you

          Dunno about appimages

          • droans@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            At least for Ubuntu, you do need to set the permissions of the AppImage before it’ll launch.

            I still haven’t figured out how to make .desktop files work yet.

      • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        With file managers, for example in thunar, you can select Properties -> Permissions -> Allow this file to run as a program

        • cerement@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          also for non-KDE, non-Gnome systems, there’s appimaged – requires a little more setup, but handles the set executable, automates the AppImage integration (.desktop files and menus), keeps a watch on specific folders for new AppImages, and provides a way to check for updates

          • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m saving this. I don’t use any appimages (except a cracked Minecraft bedrock launcher but we dont talk about that one), but I’m still going to save this.

      • Ziixe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I installed Linux a few weeks ago and it was on Tuesday I wanted to add some programs I had installed (it was mGBA and melonDS) to my steam launcher, I went through the hassle of making a . desktop file for both of them (I was dumb and used a Ubuntu based distro, so it installed as a snap, which sucks hard on a hdd) and then it wouldn’t launch, I searched up again (I was using chatGPT for all of this, I asked it a lot how to do stuff, it’s like this was it’s purpose beacuse it always worked first try), did the chmod x+ command and then I was done

        Just to see it not launch :/

      • bellsDoSing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, if all you’ve ever experienced in regards to terminals is windows CMD, then you really haven’t seen much. I mean that possitively. Actually, it will give you a far worse impression on what using a Linux / Unix terminal can be like (speaking as someone who spent what feel’s like years in terminals, of which the least amount in windows CMD).

        I suggest to simply play around with a Linux terminal (e.g. install VirtualBox,.then use it to install e.g. Ubuntu, then follow some simple random “Linux terminal beginner tutorial” you can find online).

        • Kühe sind toll@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Windows Terminal is absolute Garbage. I tried to use it for some very simple stuff and it was such a trash experience. It just feels wrong.

      • psud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Don’t worry about the terminal until or unless you have something to do that needs it, then follow a guide

        Incidentally if a guide tells you to run a program in terminal, you can check what that program is supposed to do

        • man command (eg. man mount) gives you the manual, if it has a manual
        • command -h or --help gives you the command’s help page - pipe it through “less” if it’s more than a single screen eg: ls -h | less