• cannache@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah man, you can believe in private property and still agree to share certain things based on consent.

        • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly, and we can revoke consent to have the limited shared resources of this planet and our labour exploited by billionaires.

          • cannache@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah I’m not a billionaire but I don’t see why Tesla etal deserves the hate often seen here. You’re just showing your true nature, that you withhold love and resources

            • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I don’t see why Tesla etal deserves the hate often seen here

              That’s called ignorance. Figure it out.

    • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      His math is off, at least for the US. You are in New Zealand so it’s probably less bad for you. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States#:~:text=As of late 2022%2C according,a total of %2443.45 trillion.

      Distribute that 4.5 trillion between 330 million people and you only get 10000. You would need to take 45 trillion from the top 1% to give everyone else 100000

      It’s still absurd how much money they have.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m interested in how and why they think it will be distributed cause it seems to me that it wouldn’t flow to the bottom

        • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh wow yeah let’s get right on crafting a transition plan into billionaires theoretically not existing wow what a great idea. I had thought he was just demonstrating how much wealth they have captured with a thought experiment but oh boy, you specimen of progress, you actually want to do it! How brave.

          Cunt.

            • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Corps like Marlboro advertised their products were healthy for years, don’t suggest that corps don’t cause problems or won’t cause problems. Billionaires direct the actions of corps and use them as shields for liability.

              • Fizz@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t think I did suggest that corps won’t cause problems. I was going to try make the point that if there were no billionaires then that wealth would flow to the pockets of corporations not the everyday person.

                • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  People own corps. If it’s billionaires or a trade union owning the corp, it’s a little different.