E.g. abortion rights, anti-LGBTQ, contempt for atheism, Christian nationalism, etc.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    I tried to word it as non-biased as possible. How would you word it to make it less biased in your opinion?

    • hightrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This comment and my other in the thread are gonna get a ton of downvotes, so I’m just going to own it.

      Also, this is entirely from my experience with republicans in real life. I am not one, but many of my family and friends are.

      First, most are not anti-LGBT at all. Most that I know are against these laws that are being out into place. But these issues are not very important to them so they don’t have strong convictions that would dissuade them from voting based on this issue. They will not engage if you call them anti-LGBT because they are not.

      Second, contempt for atheist. This is a perspective that comes from the online and media representation of republicans. I’ve never heard a single discussion about atheists with republicans. This is not an issue, period. They will not engage in discussion around an issue they do not see as an issue.

      Third, Christian nationalism is, again, not relevant to these people. They do not see it as real nor do they see it as a real problem. They may engage with this discussion. So I don’t see a need to reword this one.

      Lastly, abortion rights. This isn’t how republicans frame the issue. They view it as a human right and ending a human life early. I don’t agree, but they will not engage with someone asking why they are against “abortion rights”.

      Again, let me repeat, I voted straight dem ticket last election. I am only giving my perspective based on interactions with real life republicans.

      • Skavau@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        Third, Christian nationalism is, again, not relevant to these people. They do not see it as real nor do they see it as a real problem. They may engage with this discussion. So I don’t see a need to reword this one.

        The literal current Republican speaker of the House stated outright that the USA is “depraved” and key parts of his reasoning for this was the prominence of LGBT people in modern culture and declining church attendance and religious observation.

        I fully agree that your average random Republican doesn’t necessarily hate LGBT people, or non-theists but they’re simply not paying attention to the outrageous crap many elected representatives are saying.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for your response. Much appreciated.

        Still, the things you say they don’t want to engage in a conversation about or even acknowledge are actual policies the party engages heavily in. And that’s really my question. How do they reconcile their non-religious convictions with those religious policies of the party.

        Do you mean they just don’t care and vote for the party regardless because there’s one policy they like?

        • hightrix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          They honestly seem like any other voter. For me, I don’t agree with every position the dem party takes. They are the same, they simply agree with republicans more the democrats.

          At least that’s my take.

        • KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I read it as being a matter of phrasing. Which will make rewording potentially difficult. But for instance, you use the phrase “Christian Nationalism” to cover an umbrella of policies you see as related, I think OP is saying that your average republican doesn’t identify their policies and opinions as being part of the Christian nationalism umbrella. Since they don’t make that association, they don’t, maybe even don’t know how to, engage under that umbrella.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Having grown up in the rural deep south, this feels like more of a description of blue state Republicans than red state Republicans.

        You can clearly see that plenty of states have Republicans that care about LGBT issues. In Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee, and West Virginia, less than 1/3rd of Republicans think homosexuality should be accepted. And it’s not like all the other states are blowing them out of the water. A majority of Republicans/Republican leaners believe gay marriage being legal is somewhat or very bad for society. Less than half believe it is acceptable for gay people to raise children. And that’s not even touching trans issues.

      • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, this seems like the depiction of a bunch of people that are safe and prosperous and can’t imagine how their views could possibly be problematic, and don’t need to, and so avoid political discussions because it’s just a bit too yuck and they’d prefer to lead their happy lives.

        Basically the conservative - privilege coupling that is so shit.