E.g. abortion rights, anti-LGBTQ, contempt for atheism, Christian nationalism, etc.

  • centof@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like how you call out some terms used to dehumanization. Fetus, baby, and child also fit into that bucket imo.

    So ,to clarify, you want the government to restrict and punish abortion? I thought libertarians were for less government.

    Why should the government have a monopoly on violence and force in this case? Instead shouldn’t the enforcement of moral law like the NAP be up to their peers or free market hired private contractors?

    • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some libertarians are minarchist meaning as little government as possible, some are anarcho-capitalists. Pro-life minarchists would be fine having punishment of abortion be treated like any other killing of a human. Anarcho-capitalists would rather not have government have a monopoly on violence.

      If the NAP could be easily dismissed by just reclassifying who is and isn’t a human, then yes some form of law setting clarifying what a human is would be necessary. You bring up THE most interesting debate though in libertarian circles IMHO. Tom Woods did an interview with Gerard Casey about this topic. I highly recommend listening to the interview and giving Casey’s book a read.

      https://tomwoods.com/libertarian-anarchy-against-the-state-2/