Stiven_Crysis@alien.topB to Apple@hardware.watchEnglish · 1 year agoApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro review - Efficiency before performancewww.notebookcheck.netexternal-linkmessage-square113fedilinkarrow-up11
arrow-up11external-linkApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro review - Efficiency before performancewww.notebookcheck.netStiven_Crysis@alien.topB to Apple@hardware.watchEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square113fedilink
minus-squareMC_chrome@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI don’t see how redesigning the band connector will lead to improved battery life…
minus-squareShaidarHaran2@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIn a small device like the watch, the attachment mechanism and all the structure needed for it takes substantial space where every millimeter is at a premium
minus-squareMC_chrome@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year ago all the structure needed for it takes substantial space where every millimeter is at a premium The rumored magnetic system that the Apple Watch X is supposed to be using does not look like it will be saving much space at all, if any.
I don’t see how redesigning the band connector will lead to improved battery life…
In a small device like the watch, the attachment mechanism and all the structure needed for it takes substantial space where every millimeter is at a premium
The rumored magnetic system that the Apple Watch X is supposed to be using does not look like it will be saving much space at all, if any.